[2017-02-21 15:57] Ansgar Burchardt <ans...@debian.org> > part text/plain 525 > Hi,
> besides the patch containing unrelated changes, having an extra package > per service management system seems very far from ideal to me. > It was possible for all of sysvinit/upstart/systemd to be handled by > the same package. Why can't runit do this? It can, but if you ask me, it would be much better for every <daemon> and for each <init> system have <daemon>-<init> binary package, so you can install only things you really need. I, as user, disapprove having files that are of no use to me. I know, not everyone share this maxima. My vision of possibilities (in decreasing preference) - runit support in at-run from src:at - runit support in at from src:at - runit support in at-run from src:at-run What is your decision? > See also the discussions on -devel@ about tiny packages (for > Javascript stuff, but that comes at least from upstream and is not a > Debian invention). Oh, please. It is totally unrelated matter. Issue with these node- packages is that most of them are of no interest by themself, save they are dependencies of something significant, so people are relucant to consider them as first-class packages. -- X-Web-Site: https://sinsekvu.github.io | Note that I process my email in batch, Accept-Languages: eo,ru,en | at most once every 24 hours. If matter Accept: text/plain, text/x-diff | is urgent, you have my phone number.
pgp4ldJiSQWwr.pgp
Description: PGP signature
