On Wed, Feb 22, 2017 at 04:11:45PM +0100, Philipp Kern wrote: > Why would I need to justify package presence in a serious RC bug?
No need, the idea was for this bug to be either reassigned to ftp.debian.org (keeping the severity) or downgraded to serve as documentation, but not both. > It only builds libstdc++5. It's not even a full compiler. That's for > compatibility with old binaries. Ok. Do we have such old binaries in stretch? Are such old binaries still distributed outside Debian? If not, are there any other objective criteria which is supposed to be met before removing libstdc++5? Or we are keeping it just for inertia? Thanks.
