Christian Seiler <> writes:

> Specifically take a look at this message from the author of the original
> tool:
> The fork appears to have happened after that, but wasn't mentioned at
> all on the upstream mailing list.

"However, the basic ideas seem like good ones, and I'll look into
adopting these with a less offensive implementation."

Seems like the author liked the concepts behinds the patches, but felt
that the patches needed more work. I think I would have started by
trying to submit a smaller change (e.g. maybe the first patch in the

I don't see any response to this email.

Doesn't inspire confidence :-(
Brian May <>

Reply via email to