> On 10556 March 1977, Paul Slootman wrote: > > > The problem lies within the lines: > > dpkg: error processing > > /var/cache/apt/archives/nagios-plugins-basic_1.4.2-6_i386.deb (--unpack): > > trying to overwrite `/usr/lib/nagios/plugins/check_disk', which is also in > > package netsaint-plugins > > dpkg: error processing > > /var/cache/apt/archives/nagios-plugins-standard_1.4.2-6_i386.deb (--unpack): > > trying to overwrite `/usr/lib/nagios/plugins/check_breeze', which is also > > in package netsaint-plugins > > Thats too late. That old package is only left in woodys non-us, removed > from the main archive for nearly two years now, so if one should > conflict with something that would have need to be done in sarge, which > is obviously too late.
Simply removing it from the archive doesn't mean it's removed from users' systems. Adding a conflicts _will_. I don't really see why it matters that it's too late for sarge. How about people that track testing... like me. > And this is an uncommon case or we would have had much more of these > reports, so it isnt also not enough for a sarge point release. I'm not asking for a sarge point release, I'm asking for a conflicts to be added to nagios-plugins-basic. I'm not bothering to reopen the bug, but IMO the bug is still there. Paul Slootman -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
