On Sun, Nov 27, 2016 at 12:36:05PM -0500, Antoine Beaupré wrote: > On 2016-11-27 11:16:11, Holger Levsen wrote: > > On Sun, Nov 27, 2016 at 10:39:16AM -0500, Antoine Beaupré wrote: > >> > … you've been attacked. > >> I beg to disagree. I doubt that M. Kshevetskiy has been, in this case, > >> individually targeted for attack. > > > > me too. and I never said he had been individually been attacked. I just > > said he had been attacked. > > Good point. > > It's just the error message explicitly says "you". :) > > >> I am reopening this bug. It has been forwarded upstream, where I have > >> brought more suggestions on how to improve the user experience here. > > > > I'd suggest downgrade to important (at max, probably normal is better) > > and maybe also to tag it as "unreproducible" (as its not reliable > > reproducible…) so that the package doesnt get kicked out of testing… > > That's fine with me!
For the record, I can still reproduce this in Debian jessie, which is pretty bad - shouldn't a stable update be shipped for this already? Things seem fine in stretch, however. A. -- In serious work commanding and discipline are of little avail. - Peter Kropotkin
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature