Thanks. It seems like getaddrinfo() is returning two results when resolving
localhost. Can you provide the contents of your hostname resolution-related
configuration please? I.e., /etc/hosts, /etc/resolv.conf,
/etc/nsswitch.conf, anything else you might have tweaked in that area.
On Sat, May 6, 2017 at 7:15 PM, Adam Borowski <kilob...@angband.pl> wrote:
> On Sat, May 06, 2017 at 06:38:19PM +0200, Michael Stapelberg wrote:
> > Thanks for the strace. We can see that sslh creates two sockets of the
> same
> > address family, on the same host and port:
> >
> > […]
> > [pid 23812] socket(AF_INET, SOCK_STREAM, IPPROTO_IP) = 3
> > [pid 23812] setsockopt(3, SOL_SOCKET, SO_REUSEADDR, [1], 4) = 0
> > [pid 23812] setsockopt(3, SOL_IP, IP_FREEBIND, [1], 4) = 0
> > [pid 23812] bind(3, {sa_family=AF_INET, sin_port=htons(37229),
> > sin_addr=inet_addr("127.0.0.1")}, 16) = 0
> > [pid 23812] listen(3, 50) = 0
> > [pid 23812] socket(AF_INET, SOCK_STREAM, IPPROTO_IP) = 4
> > [pid 23812] setsockopt(4, SOL_SOCKET, SO_REUSEADDR, [1], 4) = 0
> > [pid 23812] setsockopt(4, SOL_IP, IP_FREEBIND, [1], 4) = 0
> > [pid 23812] bind(4, {sa_family=AF_INET, sin_port=htons(37229),
> > sin_addr=inet_addr("127.0.0.1")}, 16) = -1 EADDRINUSE (Address already
> in
> > use)
> > […]
> >
> > Does the attached patch help by any chance? If not, could you supply a
> new
> > strace file, with both patches applied please?
>
> No help; strace attached.
>
>
> Meow!
> --
> Don't be racist. White, amber or black, all beers should be judged based
> solely on their merits. Heck, even if occasionally a cider applies for a
> beer's job, why not?
> On the other hand, corpo lager is not a race.
>
--
Best regards,
Michael
