Dear Hamish,

This type of bug closure causes me to have little confidence in the
Debian bug tracking system.  While version changes occurred in xlibs
and pcb in the 2001 timeframe, the bug I filed was based on the very
latest versions of these packages in the Debian testing distribution.
I upgrade my installation every few days.

Also, your statement "I think this bug . . . has been fixed . . . ."
tells me you don't know if it has actually been fixed, or if it has
cropped up again.  Without knowing, how can you close the bug report??

Sincerely,

Fred Ringwald
New Haven, NY
------- Start of forwarded message -------
Envelope-to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Loop: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Debian Bug Tracking System)
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Bug#113427 acknowledged by developer
         (Pcb bug fixed ages ago)
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Debian-PR-Message: they-closed 113427
X-Debian-PR-Package: pcb
X-Debian-PR-Keywords: 
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2005 00:03:09 -0800
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.2 (2004-11-16) on newskate.ringwald
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=ham 
        version=3.0.2

This is an automatic notification regarding your Bug report
#113427: pcb: package xlibs conflicted with pcb in recent xlibs upgrade,
which was filed against the pcb package.

It has been closed by one of the developers, namely
Hamish Moffatt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>.

Their explanation is attached below.  If this explanation is
unsatisfactory and you have not received a better one in a separate
message then please contact the developer, by replying to this email.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

Received: (at 113427-done) by bugs.debian.org; 16 Feb 2005 07:58:35 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Feb 15 23:58:34 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from risingsoftware01.propagation.net [66.221.33.65] (Debian-exim)
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
        id 1D1K4w-0007KY-00; Tue, 15 Feb 2005 23:58:34 -0800
Received: from 203-217-38-97.dyn.iinet.net.au ([203.217.38.97] 
helo=noddy.cloud.net.au)
        by risingsoftware01.propagation.net with asmtp 
(TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA:16)
        (Exim 4.34)
        id 1D1K4w-0004tV-1t
        for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Wed, 16 Feb 2005 01:58:34 -0600
Received: from hamish by noddy.cloud.net.au with local (Exim 4.44)
        id 1D1K5z-0002gG-GM
        for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Wed, 16 Feb 2005 18:59:39 +1100
Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2005 18:59:39 +1100
From: Hamish Moffatt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Pcb bug fixed ages ago
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no 
        version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

I think this bug (xlibs and pcb conflict) has been fixed ages ago. Both
have had several version changes since Sep 2001.

Hamish
- -- 
Hamish Moffatt VK3SB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
------- End of forwarded message -------



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to