Balasankar C dijo [Wed, Jun 21, 2017 at 08:18:11AM +0530]: > >Umh, the name 'tool' is as generic as 'general purpose library'. Could > >you provide a description that people would find useful to know > >whether they could use this library (so that it's not _only_ used as a > >dependency)? > > To be honest, I did feel the same when I filed this ITP and I spent > some time thinking of a better description. However, after reading > the code, the description is probably the best one it can have. This > gem basically bundles three or four different helper methods that > are mainly to be used by Sinatra and Mustermann. I don't think I can > find a better short description that conveys this fact. Maybe change > "general purpose library" with "collection of helper methods". > > What I can do is beef up the extended description to specify what > all are the methods and clarify that they are mainly used by Sinatra > and Mustermann for their specific code structure.
Ummm, I'd probably say "collection of helper methods for Sinatra and Mustermann" then :) Making it clear from the short description what this "tool" aims to. (still, terrible naming for a piece of software!) > As English isn't my best attribute, I'm open to any suggestion you > may have. Else I will make the changes mentioned above. I can tell you that it's quite clear that self.english.skills < 'native' as well ;-)