On Thu, Jun 29, 2017 at 04:39:21PM +0100, Dominic Hargreaves wrote: > On Thu, Jun 29, 2017 at 03:07:39PM +0300, Niko Tyni wrote: > > Package: release.debian.org > > User: release.debian....@packages.debian.org > > Usertags: transition > > X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-p...@lists.debian.org > > > > We'd like to get Perl 5.26 in sid/buster soonish. > > > > As usual, we've done test rebuilds of packages build dependending on perl. > > Things are looking pretty good. Known issues are at > > > > > > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?tag=perl-5.26-transition;users=debian-p...@lists.debian.org > > > > and should be marked as blockers of this bug next. > > Previously we only used blockers to track FTBFS in packages needing > binNMUing - so far I have just added those. I think it probably makes > sense to keep with that, as the above link give you the full picture > when needed.
Fine by me of course. Should we also mark possible unrelated sid FTBFS bugs of those packages as blockers? ISTR us doing that in the past. (I'm not aware of any such bugs at the moment, but we should probably do one more full binNMU test rebuild sweep in addition of the incremental ones we're doing currently.) -- Niko
