On 07/08/2017 07:47 AM, Antonio Terceiro wrote: > > This seems wrong. If you get a failure after trying to update the > package to 3.9.0, by definition the bug cannot be against version 3.8.2 > (which does not exist in Debian BTW, you missed the Debian revision > number). > > IMO the BTS should be used for bugs that are not present in the Debian > archive.
But we do file bugs to updating new upstream releases against the existing versions. How this is different? If I retitle the bug to "update to latest upstream release", would it be okay?
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
