On Tue, Jul 11, 2017 at 08:40:53PM +0530, Vasudev Kamath wrote: > Hey William, > > Very very sorry about such a delayed response.
No worries. > > William Blough <[email protected]> writes: > > > Source: pugixml > > Severity: wishlist > > > > The passwordsafe package uses pugixml, but requires wchar to be enabled. > > If a > > wchar enabled version (see pugiconfig.hpp) was included along side the > > current > > version, I could remove the embedded copy of pugixml from passwordsafe and > > depend on the packaged version instead. > > Is it OK to enable this in default version itself instead of creating > one more version?. Will it create any problems?. It would be fine for my use case, but I don't know how it would affect other users. I'm thinking it would probably be fine, as a nonwide char should fit in a wide char. But I don't really work with wide charsets that much, so my intuition may be wrong.
