Hello Laurent Bigonville píše v Pá 14. 07. 2017 v 17:57 +0200: > It seems that libgusb2 has lost some symbols in the last upgrade > without > bumping the soname. > > fwupd is complaining with the following messages: > > jui 14 17:49:30 valinor fwupd[2426]: failed to open plugin > /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/fwupd-plugins-2/libfu_plugin_unifying.so: > failed to open plugin: /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/fwupd-plugins- > 2/libfu_plugin_unifying.so: symbol g_usb_device_get_release, version > LIBGUSB_0.1.0 not defined in file libgusb.so.2 with link time > reference > jui 14 17:49:30 valinor fwupd[2426]: failed to open plugin > /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/fwupd-plugins-2/libfu_plugin_usb.so: failed > to open plugin: /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/fwupd-plugins- > 2/libfu_plugin_usb.so: symbol g_usb_device_get_release, version > LIBGUSB_0.1.0 not defined in file libgusb.so.2 with link time > reference > jui 14 17:49:30 valinor fwupd[2426]: failed to open plugin > /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/fwupd-plugins-2/libfu_plugin_colorhug.so: > failed to open plugin: /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/fwupd-plugins- > 2/libfu_plugin_colorhug.so: symbol g_usb_context_wait_for_replug, > version LIBGUSB_0.1.0 not defined in file libgusb.so.2 with link time > reference > jui 14 17:49:30 valinor fwupd[2426]: failed to open plugin > /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/fwupd-plugins-2/libfu_plugin_altos.so: > failed to open plugin: /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libdfu.so.1: symbol > g_usb_interface_get_subclass, version LIBGUSB_0.1.0 not defined in > file libgusb.so.2 with link time reference > jui 14 17:49:30 valinor fwupd[2426]: failed to open plugin > /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/fwupd-plugins-2/libfu_plugin_dfu.so: failed > to open plugin: /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libdfu.so.1: symbol > g_usb_interface_get_subclass, version LIBGUSB_0.1.0 not defined in > file libgusb.so.2 with link time reference
The problem is that 0.2.8 and 0.2.9 releases had broken version script (not listing some newly added symbols and those were wrongly generated as introduced in LIBGUSB_0.1.0, while they were added later). This was fixed in the 0.2.10 release: https://github.com/hughsie/libgusb/compare/gusb_0_2_9...gusb_0_2_10#dif f-5252c79baf9de758594b8543f116836d I will revert the symbol versioning changes and let's see how upstream will address this: https://github.com/hughsie/libgusb/issues/9 -- Michal Čihař | https://cihar.com/ | https://weblate.org/
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
