Hi,

On 16/07/17 23:31, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> Control: tag -1 upstream patch
> 
> On Sun, 2017-07-16 at 23:21 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
>> On Thu, 2017-07-06 at 13:10 +0300, Adrian Bunk wrote:
>>> Control: reassign -1 src:linux 4.9.30-2
>>> Control: retitle -1 mips/mipsel: mips-linux-gnu-gccgo-7: waitid: bad address
>>> Control: affects -1 src:golang-github-pelletier-go-toml 
>>> src:golang-github-nicksnyder-go-i18n gccgo-7
>>>
>>> On Thu, Jul 06, 2017 at 02:11:00AM +0300, Adrian Bunk wrote:
>>>> Source: golang-github-pelletier-go-toml
>>>> Version: 1.0.0-1
>>>> Severity: serious
>>>>
>>>> https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=golang-github-pelletier-go-toml&suite=sid
>>>>
>>>> ...
>>>>    dh_auto_test -a -O--buildsystem=golang
>>>>    go test -v -p 4 github.com/pelletier/go-toml 
>>>> github.com/pelletier/go-toml/cmd github.com/pelletier/go-toml/cmd/tomljson 
>>>> github.com/pelletier/go-toml/cmd/tomll github.com/pelletier/go-toml/query
>>>> go build github.com/davecgh/go-spew/spew: /usr/bin/mips-linux-gnu-gccgo-7: 
>>>> waitid: bad address
>>>> FAIL       github.com/pelletier/go-toml [build failed]
>>>> ?          github.com/pelletier/go-toml/cmd        [no test files]
>>>> ...
>>>
>>> James Cowgill told me that this is actually a kernel bug:
>>>   https://www.linux-mips.org/archives/linux-mips/2017-03/msg00580.html
>>
>> That's now a 404, strangely.  Did you mean "[PATCH 0/2] Fix indirect
>> syscall handler for syscalls with > 4 args"?

Hmm, I may have made a typo with that link. Here's the real one:
https://www.linux-mips.org/archives/linux-mips/2017-03/msg00575.html

> James - assuming I guessed correctly above, why is it that the second
> patch "MIPS: Remove pt_regs adjustments in indirect syscall handler"
> hasn't been applied?  Was this fixed some other way upstream?

I've just tried with v4.13-rc1 and the bug is still not fixed there. My
guess is that the first patch is more obviously correct than the second
one so was applied first. I have never received any feedback on these
patches so I don't actually know why only one of them was applied.

Thanks,
James

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply via email to