> Norman Ramsey <n...@cs.tufts.edu> wrote: > |I upgraded from jessie to stretch, and I expected to continue using > |heirloom-mailx as my implementation of mailx. But my system was > |somehow switched to bsd-mailx. Worse, update-alternatives is not > |capable of changing back: > ... > |I expected /usr/bin/heirloom-mailx to be an alternative on this menu. > | > |This is possibly the same bug as 858080, but I don't know enough > |Debian jargon to know for sure. > > The just released S-nail/mailx v14.9.0 adds support for custom > headers, so one could possibly hope something moves on. > That is all i (as the S-nail maintainer) can do,
Sorry, I think I misunderstand something. I would think that participation in update-alternatives would be a packaging issue, not an upstream issue. And I don't see a connection to custom headers... Norman
