On 27.07.2017 15:05, Michael Stapelberg wrote: > It does break the API, as evinced by one build failure. > > I’m not aware of situations in the past where we created a new binary. How > would we name them? Is it worth the trouble? > > Personally, I would just update the new version + the fixed affected packages > in one go, to reduce the breakage to a minimum.
... and generally, vendoring certain older revisions if needed to build always is at hand. DS -- 4096R/DF5182C8 (sten...@debian.org) http://www.danielstender.com/
