Santiago Vila <sanv...@unex.es> writes:
> I wonder if we really want to do all that in 2017. The staff-writable
> /usr/local for a "sysadmin assistant" was an interesting idea twenty
> years ago. Today, we would give a sysadmin assistant an entire virtual
> machine to play with, and would probably not bother with this.
> So my question would be: Do we really need to support both ways to
> handle /usr/local at this point?
Yeah, that was the same conversation that Sean and I had. I think it may
be fine to just do a straight cutover to typical permissions with no
support of the staff group.
> And for practical purposes: Will packages really stop fiddling with
> /usr/local once I remove /etc/staff-group-for-usr-local in buster
> initial install? I have been hesitant of doing this move because I never
> took the time to recollect data that would tell me whether or not it
> would work.
Yeah, that's a great question. We should at least be sure that debhelper
will do the right thing.
Russ Allbery (r...@debian.org) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>