> Also, giving that there are many packages with almost insanely large > names, this is a problem -- too much space wasted in versions, not > enough space for names.
IMHO there are much more packages with insanely long version numbers, as the screenshot has indicated. I would suggest to either give the user the means to adjust the format, or to make it more dynamic, e.g. to use 60% line length for the package name, and 20% each for both version numbers, regardless if you have 80 or 200 columns. Regards Harri
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature