> Also, giving that there are many packages with almost insanely large
> names, this is a problem -- too much space wasted in versions, not
> enough space for names.

IMHO there are much more packages with insanely long version numbers,
as the screenshot has indicated.

I would suggest to either give the user the means to adjust the format,
or to make it more dynamic, e.g. to use 60% line length for the package
name, and 20% each for both version numbers, regardless if you have 80
or 200 columns.


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply via email to