On Mon 2017-08-07 13:33:00 +0200, Mattia Rizzolo wrote: > As you know we/I regularly backport diffoscope to Debian stable, so we > care about having those tools available there as well. > So, do you plan on making gnupg-utils available in stretch-backports > (with all the ongoing maintenance that such choice entails) or do you > think that having an alternate build-dependency+recommends is a way to > go here (possibly with a version restriction, e.g. > gnupg-utils | gnupg (<< 2.1.21-4~) > )?
this looks dependency looks fine to me. I'd rather not commit to backporting gnupg to stretch-bpo just yet. > I'd like to avoid having a delta between buster and stretch-bpo, at > least not this early in the development cycle.. yep, that makes sense. > Also, do you plan on sending a patch for diffoscope? :D it's on my stack, but it won't be in the next week or two. if someone beats me to it i won't be upset :) --dkg