On Tue, Aug 08, 2017 at 09:42:11AM +0900, Norbert Preining wrote:
> On Sun, 06 Aug 2017, Holger Levsen wrote:
> > jadetex package description says it's a transitional package (in stretch and
> > upwards), yet it still contains stuff and not mere meta data.
> It contains changelog, readme that explains the situation. Isn't that fine?
> Are there any regulations that a transitional package has to be empty?
> In contrast, changelog and copyright *need* to be in the package by policy.

those files all need to be in the otherwise empty package, but looking at
http://sources.debian.net/src/jadetex/3.13-17/ I see a lot more files.
> > I guess the proper cause of action would be to remove the package from sid.
> That is the plan in the near future.

great, thanks.


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply via email to