On 2017-08-09 19:09, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> I can't find a *gsl*prof* package in the archive, so this indeed seems
> to be a new one. And should be totally unrelated to the splitting of the
> library package.
That's an interesting one. Above analysis was without looking at the
source. It's in the source package, but did not get built so far,
except for your last upload. Let me see what happens in my local build ...
In the i386 build log from the buildd I see:
dpkg-genchanges: warning: package libgsl-prof in control file but not in
files list
BTW, you should use source-only uploads nowadays (unless you have
something that needs to go through NEW).
Looking at the source now:
$ grep -r libgsl-prof debian/
debian/rules:profpack := libgsl-prof
debian/control:Package: libgsl-prof
$ grep -r profpack debian/
debian/rules:#profpack := libgsl$(sonum)-prof
debian/rules:profpack := libgsl-prof
debian/rules:debprof := $(CURDIR)/debian/$(profpack)
debian/rules:export DH_OPTIONS =-N$(libpack) -N$(libcblas) -N$(devpack)
-N$(binpack) -N$(dbgpack) -p$(profpack)
debian/rules:export DH_OPTIONS =-N$(profpack)
debian/rules: $(MAKE) -f debian/rules DH_OPTIONS="-i -N$(profpack)"
binary-common
debian/rules: $(MAKE) -f debian/rules DH_OPTIONS="-a -N$(profpack)"
binary-common
and without even doing '$PAGER debian/rules' I'd recommend:
* switch to dh
gsl is probably a long grown packaging ... according to the
changelog the package origin predates my first potato system
in 1999 :-)
So something changed on your build machine and libgsl-prof
got built this time.
... local rebuild of -5 finished:
dpkg-genchanges: warning: package libgsl-prof in control file but not in files
list
Andreas
