On Thu, Aug 10, 2017 at 11:36:03AM -0700, Ian A Mason wrote:
> Andrey,
> We do not see any lintian warnings:
> dpkg-deb: building package 'libpoly-dev' in
> '../libpoly-dev_1.4-1_amd64.deb'.
> dpkg-deb: building package 'libpoly0' in '../libpoly0_1.4-1_amd64.deb'.
> dpkg-deb: building package 'libpoly-dbg' in
> '../libpoly-dbg_1.4-1_amd64.deb'.
>  dpkg-genbuildinfo
>  dpkg-genchanges  >../libpoly0_1.4-1_amd64.changes
> dpkg-genchanges: info: including full source code in upload
>  dpkg-source --after-build libpoly
> dpkg-buildpackage: info: full upload (original source is included)
> Now running lintian...
> Finished running lintian.
> So I am confused by your comments.
My comments mostly aren't about lintian, but you need to run lintian with
-IE --pedantic against libpoly0_1.4-1_amd64.changes:

X: libpoly0 source: debian-control-has-obsolete-dbg-package libpoly-dbg
I: libpoly0 source: duplicate-short-description libpoly0 libpoly-dev libpoly-dbg
W: libpoly0 source: out-of-date-standards-version 3.9.8 (current is 4.0.0)
I: libpoly0 source: testsuite-autopkgtest-missing
I: libpoly0 source: debian-watch-file-is-missing
P: libpoly-dbg: no-upstream-changelog
P: libpoly-dev: no-upstream-changelog
I: libpoly-dev: extended-description-is-probably-too-short
I: libpoly0: hardening-no-bindnow usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libpoly.so.0.1.4
P: libpoly0: no-upstream-changelog
I: libpoly0: extended-description-is-probably-too-short


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to