On Sat, Aug 12, 2017 at 09:37:12PM +0200, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> Hi
> On Sat, Aug 12, 2017 at 01:52:43PM -0400, Ondrej Novy wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > we are already using:
> > 
> > --size-limit=16384x16384
> Yupp, I know that, I added that comment to the tracker. It's not clear
> to me if we need to limit it quite further. The android approach is to
> limit it to 4k frames. Mabe inded we shoult mark it as fixed for that
> version where the size-limit was added (which should be 1.4.0-4. But
> the size-limit to 16384x16384  was back in 2015 added to
> mitigate/workaround CVE-2015-1258. So I suspect we will need to limit
> it further.

I think our build is perfectly fine in stretch. It's probably a bigger
issue for libvpx as used by smart phones, but for a desktop build
I don't think we shoudl modify the current defaults in stable (it might
break existing setups even).

I think we can mark this as unimportant and for buster follow upstream

> cc'ing Moritz, who added libvpx to our DSA needed list on that
> purpose.

That was only for oldstable, sorry for the confusion.


Reply via email to