Hello Juliusz, > I've just pulled your change to the tetex paths into upstream Cedilla. > This should in principle lead to a clean merge when you pull from me.
Ok great. > I'd like to mention that you should tighten the dependency in 0.5-3: > it should now suggest the tetex-extra version that changed the paths. Good catch. I forgot about that. > What do you think: should I simply include the AFMs for the base-13 > fonts in Cedilla itself? I guess it would make our lives easier. It would but having 2 copies of the fonts would be not-Debian like. I'll try to watch the tetex packages more closely now. Groetjes, Peter -- signature -at- pvaneynd.mailworks.org http://www.livejournal.com/users/pvaneynd/ "God, root, what is difference?" Pitr | "God is more forgiving." Dave Aronson| -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
