On 2017-08-21 15:22:49 [+0200], Luca Capello wrote: > Hi there, Hi, > Given that no documentation was available, not even in the upstream > files, I was lost, so this would be the first improvement. > > I was not aware that upstream chose the "full-systemd path", so I guess > changing that is a no-op, so at least the documentation must be fixed.
Oh well. It was submitted upstream and accepted. And since then I reverted a part of it because it caused trouble. Now that I look at this again, I am kind of leaning towards removing the socket part as well. I can't currently figure out a reason why the socket-support via/by systemd is a good thing. The auto-activation thing was one thing but this bit us at least once. So if nothing changes I probably submit a patch upstream to remove the socket support and then we will be back to one config file again. > Thx, bye, > Gismo / Luca > Sebasian
