On Wed, 30 Aug 2017 15:05:30 +0100 Luca Boccassi <bl...@debian.org> wrote: > On Fri, 18 Aug 2017 07:35:20 +0200 Christian Ehrhardt <christian.ehrhar > d...@canonical.com> wrote: > > For a grain of confidence and background - Upstream there is also a > follow > > up fix [1], but that is not needed for your package. > > > > The reason is, that this follow up is only needed if dpdk has no > > pkg-config, which the 16.11 based package that is in Debian right now > > already have. > > > > [1]: https://github.com/collectd/collectd/pull/2405 > > The patch I sent actually already has that fix included as well :-) > > Maintainers, gentle ping - I would like to upload a new version of DPDK > to sid (16.11.3) which will include the breaking change for !amd64. > > It would be really appreciated if this patch could be looked at. I am > more than willing to do the extra work and provide an NMU if time is > short on your hands - just let me know if it's acceptable. > > Thank you!
In case it's more convenient, I've sent a pull request on Github: https://github.com/collectd/pkg-debian/pull/14 -- Kind regards, Luca Boccassi
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
