Hello,

upstream says that the best is to remove viva from Debian altogether.
That's a bit a pitty, and I'll have to package the replacement
currently worked on.

Lisandro, do you know how to ask for the package removal? I forgot :(

Thanks, Mt.

On Sun, Sep 10, 2017 at 10:42:57AM +0200, Martin Quinson wrote:
> forwarded 875226 https://github.com/schnorr/viva/issues/13
> thanks
> 
> Hello, 
> 
> thanks for the report. I forwarded this upstream, will see how we
> should proceed.
> 
> Bye, Mt.
> 
> On Sat, Sep 09, 2017 at 11:12:17PM +0200, Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer 
> wrote:
> > Source: viva
> > Version: 1.2-1
> > Severity: wishlist
> > User: debian-qt-...@lists.debian.org
> > Usertags: qt4-removal
> > 
> > 
> > Hi! As you might know we the Qt/KDE team are preparing to remove Qt4
> > as [announced] in:
> > 
> > [announced] 
> > <https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2017/08/msg00006.html>
> > 
> > Currently Qt4 has been dead upstream and we are starting to have problems
> > maintaining it, like for example in the [OpenSSL 1.1 support] case.
> > 
> > [OpenSSL 1.1 support] 
> > <https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=828522>
> > 
> > In order to make this move, all packages directly or indirectly depending on
> > the Qt4 libraries have to either get ported to Qt5 or eventually get
> > removed from the Debian repositories.
> > 
> > Therefore, please take the time and:
> > - contact your upstream (if existing) and ask about the state of a Qt5
> > port of your application
> > - if there are no activities regarding porting, investigate whether there 
> > are
> > suitable alternatives for your users
> > - if there is a Qt5 port that is not yet packaged, consider packaging it
> > - if both the Qt4 and the Qt5 versions already coexist in the Debian
> > archives, consider removing the Qt4 version
> > 
> > = Porting =
> > 
> > Some of us where involved in various Qt4 to Qt5 migrations [migration] and 
> > we
> > know for sure that porting stuff from Qt4 to Qt5 is much much easier and 
> > less
> > painful than it was from Qt3 to Qt4.
> > 
> > We also understand that there is still a lot of software still using Qt4.
> > 
> > Don't forget to take a look at the C++ API changes page [apichanges] 
> > whenever
> > you start porting your application.
> > 
> > [migration] http://pkg-kde.alioth.debian.org/packagingqtbasedstuff.html
> > [apichanges] http://doc.qt.io/qt-5/sourcebreaks.html
> > 
> > For any questions and issues, do not hesitate to contact the Debian Qt/KDE
> > team at debian-qt-...@lists.debian.org
> > 
> > The removal is being tracked in <https://wiki.debian.org/Qt4Removal>
> > 
> > Lisandro,
> > on behalf of the Qt4 maintainers
> 
> -- 
> N'attribuez jamais à la malveillance ce qui s'explique très bien par
> l'incompétence.   -- Napoleon Bonaparte
> (Never ascribe to malice, that which can be explained by incompetence)



-- 
I know a joke about UDP, but you might not get it.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to