Control: block -1 by 875979

On Mon, 05 Sep 2016 at 15:15:46 +0300, Mert Dirik wrote:
> I know you've wanted to get some suggestions last year but this bug
> report, which is only followed by a couple users like me who were
> affected from the lack of scp, is not really the right place for
> getting answer to the questions you have in your mind. My humble
> suggestion is you should talk to OpenSSH maintainers on how to proceed
> with it and maybe consult debian-devel for policy related questions or
> best practices.

In fact the ‘scp.c’ found in the Dropbear source package comes from
OpenSSH with minor modifications, so it makes little sense to ship a
second version the scp binary.

After discussion with upstream and the OpenSSH maintainers, we agreed on
a solution:

  1. ship OpenSSH's /usr/bin/scp in a dedicated binary package (unlike
     /usr/bin/ssh it only depends on libc6), cf. #875979;
  2. make dbclient(1) accept (as no-op) the options passed by scp(1) to
     avoid warnings: `-x -oForwardAgent=no -oPermitLocalCommand=no
     -oClearAllForwardings=yes`; and
  3. for the client part, ship a `dbscp` shell wrapper invoking scp(1)
     with dbclient(1) as SSH client.

See https://lists.debian.org/debian-ssh/2017/07/msg00019.html for
details.

-- 
Guilhem.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to