Hi *, On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 06:18:03PM +0200, intrigeri wrote: ... > > Sure works for me, thanks for proposing this sensible workflow! > > OK, glad we're on the same page :) > > Let's wait for Ulrike's input before closing this bug though. > > Ulrike, what do you think? > > FTR I've just requested commit access to the Vcs-Git of src:icedove, > which if granted might streamline the process a bit more :)
I'm fine with that workflow too for now. Some small update on what src:icedove maintainer(s) is or will be. I've talked with Christoph some days ago and he informed me he hasn't enought time and will currently not work very active on Thunderbird packages in the next future. So we decided that we just switch the maintainer for src:icedove and I will step in as the main active maintianer. That's no big change as I've done this mainly for over a year. Guido isn't working on packaging new versions. I have no great experience with AppArmor (but Christoph also not), Guido don't want to do much for Thunderbird due time constraints. I'm happy he is doing all the LTS work on Thunderbird packages. So in the long turn I think it's better to migrate the AppArmor profile for Thunderbird to AppArmor itself? Otherwise we can stay on the status quo and intrigeri is performing the needed changes for the profile inside the Thunderbird packaging. Regards Carsten
