control: tags -1 patch On Thu, 21 Sep 2017 10:31:37 +0200 Matthias Klose <d...@ubuntu.com> wrote: > Package: src:lintian > Version: 2.5.53 > > it looks like one lintian autopkg test fails on 32bit archs (at least armhf > and > i386): > > tests::binaries-missing-lfs: diff -u t/tests/binaries-missing-lfs/tags > /tmp/autopkgtest.tBIVrX/autopkgtest_tmp/testsuite/tests/binaries-missing-lfs/tags.binaries-missing-lfs > --- t/tests/binaries-missing-lfs/tags 2017-09-20 08:25:06.000000000 +0000 > +++ > /tmp/autopkgtest.tBIVrX/autopkgtest_tmp/testsuite/tests/binaries-missing-lfs/tags.binaries-missing-lfs > 2017-09-21 07:29:42.150533286 +0000 > @@ -1 +1,2 @@ > +W: libbasic2: wrong-section-according-to-package-name libbasic2 => libs > X: libbasic2: binary-file-built-without-LFS-support usr/lib/libbasic.so.2 > fail tests::binaries-missing-lfs: output differs! > > http://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/l/lintian/artful/armhf > http://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/l/lintian/artful/i386 > >
diff -Nru lintian-2.5.53/t/tests/binaries-missing-lfs/debian/debian/control.in
lintian-2.5.53ubuntu2/t/tests/binaries-missing-lfs/debian/debian/control.in
--- lintian-2.5.53/t/tests/binaries-missing-lfs/debian/debian/control.in
2017-09-20 10:25:06.000000000 +0200
+++ lintian-2.5.53ubuntu2/t/tests/binaries-missing-lfs/debian/debian/control.in
2017-09-21 13:03:54.000000000 +0200
@@ -7,6 +7,7 @@
Package: libbasic2
Architecture: any
+Section: libs
Depends: $\{misc:Depends\}, $\{shlibs:Depends\}
Description: {$description}
This is a test package designed to exercise some feature or tag of
this should do the trick, I'm looking at the Ubuntu builders right now, to see
if it is sufficient
G.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
