On 09/27/2017 10:13 AM, Andreas Tille wrote: > Hi Olivier, > > On Wed, Sep 27, 2017 at 09:55:52AM +0200, Olivier Sallou wrote: >> python3-biomaj3 is recent and a rewrite of biomaj, and is in git. biomaj >> (v1) is quite old will not have other releases, so not real need to >> switch to git at this time as it will not change. > Well, if biomaj should remain in Debian we need to move it to Git before > February 2018 since SVN will be shut down. I have just created a local > Git repository and it would be easy to push this in case you confirm > that biomaj has a good purpose for our users and should remain in > Debian.
yes > In this case we could also close #848497 since the new version > *is* actually packaged ... but we could keep the old one anyway. can be closed once new packages in NEW queue are accepted > >> I uploaded in NEW the latest of biomaj3, which is splitted in multiple >> components and git repos (so multiple packages, biomaj3, >> biomaj3-download, etc.). But I forgot there was this intermediate >> version which will conflit in a binary package. I consider to remove >> this package that will be replaced by latest ones. > I'm not sure what you mean here. Are you refering to bug #866980? nope, I have uploaded new packages for biomaj3 that split biomaj3 in biomaj3, biomaj3-download etc... as now they refer to different upstream sources, so new packages. the biomaj3 package currently in testing/unstable should be removed to be replaced by the new ones. I sent a bug to ftp-masters to do so. It will be replaced by the new bunch of packages. > > Kind regards > > Andreas. > -- Olivier Sallou IRISA / University of Rennes 1 Campus de Beaulieu, 35000 RENNES - FRANCE Tel: 02.99.84.71.95 gpg key id: 4096R/326D8438 (keyring.debian.org) Key fingerprint = 5FB4 6F83 D3B9 5204 6335 D26D 78DC 68DB 326D 8438
