> No, please use a positive (or negative, but positive preferred) > architecture whitelist in *all* cases your package does not build > on all supported platforms. This also helps reduce buildd load, > because it costs quite a bit to try and build that. > > It will also make your DDPO look cleaner, whereas, in the current > situation, it will show lots of errors. >
this is something true in general. > >new release it might become supported. > > A new release where it’s supported could just extend the whitelist. > we are actively looking at build logs on m68k *because* we want to support it. Not having porterboxes, and with upstream trying to fix it, this is the only way we have. G.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
