Hi,
On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 10:00:49PM +0200, Michael Stapelberg wrote:
> control: tags -1 + pending
> 
> On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 9:38 PM, Guido Günther <a...@sigxcpu.org> wrote:
> > Hi,
> > On Sun, Oct 22, 2017 at 12:42:29PM +0200, Michael Stapelberg wrote:
> >> On Sun, Oct 22, 2017 at 12:28 PM, Guido Günther <a...@sigxcpu.org> wrote:
> >> > Hi,
> >> > On Sun, Oct 22, 2017 at 11:15:20AM +0200, Michael Stapelberg wrote:
> >> >> Thanks for filing this.
> >> >>
> >> >> On Sun, Oct 22, 2017 at 9:21 AM, Guido Günther <a...@sigxcpu.org> wrote:
> >> >> > Package: pk4
> >> >> > Version: 2
> >> >> > Severity: wishlist
> >> >> >
> >> >> > Hi,
> >> >> > it would be nice if pk4 would allow to use "gbp import-dsc" to unpack
> >> >> > the donwloaded sources in downloadDSCAndUnpack so users:
> >> >> >
> >> >> >    - get a git archive right away
> >> >> >    - can reuise their gbp configuration such as the configured 
> >> >> > builder,
> >> >> >    - pristine-tar, ... right away
> >> >>
> >> >> I think we could introduce a hook which would replace the default
> >> >> behavior of dpkg-source -x, taking as arguments the path to the DSC
> >> >> and the destination directory.
> >> >
> >> > Sounds good.
> >> >
> >> >>
> >> >> I wonder whether the gbp hook should live in the git-buildpackage
> >> >> Debian package, though? That way, you could maintain it directly. If
> >> >
> >> > Sure. It would be nice if setup for users would the be as simple as
> >> >
> >> >   ln -s /usr/share/doc/git-buildpackage/examples/pk4 
> >> > ~/pk4/pk4.deb822.d/gbp
> >>
> >> Almost:
> >>
> >> mkdir -p ~/.config/pk4/hooks-enabled/unpack/
> >> ln -s /usr/share/pk4/hooks-available/unpack/gbp \
> >> ~/.config/pk4/hooks-enabled/unpack/
> >>
> >> Regarding the symlink target, could we ship
> >> /usr/share/pk4/hooks-available/unpack/gbp in git-buildpackage? That
> >> way, all hooks would be in the same directory. This is similar to how
> >> shell tab completion files are shipped.
> >
> > Shipped now with the next gbp version:
> >
> >     https://github.com/agx/git-buildpackage/blob/master/debian/pk4
> 
> Neat!
> 
> I just committed
> https://github.com/Debian/pk4/commit/797dc0b887abbc482a7a095d687b710509a80816,
> upload to Debian follows in a second.
> 
> One thing I noticed: the resulting branches are master, pk4 and
> upstream, which the currently checked out branch being master.
> Shouldn’t the only two branches be pk4 and upstream?

Yes, that's:

    
https://github.com/agx/git-buildpackage/commit/01da1e61b003aa7cb576fbe5755a665a12c3f2ba

which I should have fixed long ago.
Cheers,
 -- Guido

> 
> >
> >> >> you think that’s not a good idea, could you suggest how the hook
> >> >> should be implemented? I’m envisioning something like this (untested):
> >> >>
> >> >> #!/bin/sh
> >> >> set -e
> >> >> mkdir -p "$2"
> >> >> cd "$2"
> >> >> git init
> >> >> gbp import-dsc "$1"
> >> >
> >> > #!/bin/sh
> >> > set -e
> >> > gbp import-dsc "$1" "$2"
> >> >
> >> > is enough (gbp will do the rest). That way we could also support
> >> > incremental imports (that is if the directory is already there we simply
> >> > import the new version on top of it so the use can diff between the old
> >> > an new version.
> >>
> >> Note that the pk4 output directories contain the version number, so I
> >> think incremental imports wouldn’t work well.
> >>
> >> >
> >> >> Side note: I think we should be fairly clear about the difference
> >> >> between a gbp-from-dsc repo and a gbp-from-gbp-clone repo, to not
> >> >> confuse our users.
> >> >
> >> > Yeah. I was thinking of putting a .git/gbp.conf into the repo that sets
> >> >
> >> >   [DEFAULT]
> >> >   upstream-branch = upstream
> >> >   debian-branch = pk4
> >> >
> >> > This would
> >> >
> >> >  - make sure we override settings any branch settings in debian/gbp.conf
> >> >    which we don't care about (since we're not cloning from Vcs-Git:
> >> >  - Having the default branch named pk4 would make it obvious that this
> >> >    is s.th. special.
> >> >
> >> > What do you think? In this case it would rather be more like your script
> >> > above:
> >>
> >> Sounds good to me.
> >>
> >> >
> >> > #!/bin/sh
> >> > set -e
> >> >
> >> > if [ ! -d $2 ]; then
> >>
> >> nit: use "$2" here as well
> >>
> >> >
> >> >   git init "$2"
> >> >
> >> >   cat <<EOF > "$2"/.git/gbp.conf
> >>
> >> I suggest to add as a comment what you wrote above for the benefit of
> >> readers of the hook :).
> >>
> >> >   [DEFAULT]
> >> >   upstream-branch = upstream
> >> >   debian-branch = pk4
> >> >   EOF
> >> > fi
> >> >
> >> > cd "$2"
> >> > gbp import-dsc "$1"
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > Does this sound reasonable? I would then also provide a script that can
> >> > be used with pk4-replace.
> >>
> >> I don’t quite follow. What sort of script is required for that?
> >
> > Probably not even a script but a post-build hook that cats the name of
> > the generated changes file to /proc/self/fd/3.
> 
> Ah, I see.
> 
> > Cheers,
> >  -- Guido
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Best regards,
> Michael
> 

Reply via email to