On Sat, Oct 28, 2017 at 10:33:38AM +0200, Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo wrote: > So, in the tests that you mention, did you try to compile packages that > depend on libxslt, with this change enabled?
I only had time to build Wine and to compile the tutorial files in the libxslt source package. Some headers, such as xsltutils.h, #include <libxslt/xsltconfig.h>, so if the compiler was unable to find xsltconfig.h, then we'd know the patch was immediately incorrect. Debian searches /usr/include and /usr/include/<triplet>, so moving the header into the triplet include path shouldn't break anything (in theory anyway). On Saturday, 28 October 2017 10:47 PM, Mattia Rizzolo wrote: > I can upload it to experimental. > Given the amount of rdeps I'd prefer if somebody could perform > comparative rebuilds (i.e. first build all rdpes using the current > unstable package, then rebuild using the new exp package and compar what > failed). A quick search shows around 80 reverse dependencies on libxslt1-dev. I'll take this on. -- Hugh McMaster