On Thu, Nov 2, 2017 at 8:25 PM, Thomas Goirand <[email protected]> wrote:

> On 11/02/2017 08:02 PM, Felipe Sateler wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 1, 2017 at 11:44 PM, Jason Pleau <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> Hi Thomas
> >>
> >> On 11/01/2017 08:51 PM, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> >>> Hi,
> >>>
> >>> Could you please upload the 2.x version of python-docker into Sid? I've
> >>> uploaded python-zunclient that needs it.
> >>>
> >>
> >> It's been a while, I think what we (still) have to do is get the
> >> rdepends updated to work with the latest python-docker. I don't think
> >> anyone looked at that yet.
> >
> > Yes, this work was pending. I never filed the bugs (sorry!), but my
> > earlier investigations showed that all rdeps had been fixed upstream,
> > but not released yet.
> >
> > I see now that you have already fixed all of them! (magnum 5.0 and
> > senlin 4 both work with python-docker 2.x, and you mention zunclient).
> >
> >>
> >> We welcome help of course, I will take some time this weekend to see
> >> what exactly needs to be done and start doing some work.
> >
> > I think all that needs to be done is to:
> >
> > 1. Declare Breaks: python-magnum (<< 5.0), python-senlin (<< 4.0),
> > docker-compose (<< 1.10).
> > 2. Same for python3 versions
> > 3. Prepare docker-compose >= 1.10
> > 4. Upload python-docker to unstable
> > 5. Upload docker-compose to unstable
> >
> > I don't have much time this week though to work on this.
> >
> > @zigo: if you want to move faster with 1, 2, and 4, please go ahead
> > (repo is at collab-maint), but make sure to file a (serious) bug to
> > docker-compose so that we don't forget to do 3 and 5.
> >
> >> (sorry for the delays on this (I honestly just forgot to follow up..)
> >
> > I had forgotten about this too. Oops!
>
> I don't think there's the need to declare such a break, since I uploaded
> senlin 4 and magnum 5 to Sid.


It is still necessary because old senlin (and magnum) can't work with new
python-docker. So partial upgrades from stretch could break if they are not
added.


> There's no python3 version of these
> packages also.
>

Good, no need to add the python3 versions.


>
> I'm not sure how docker-compose is involved here...
>

Because it also depends on python-docker, and also needs a new version to
handle python-docker 2.x...

-- 

Saludos,
Felipe Sateler

Reply via email to