On Tue, Nov 07, 2017 at 12:48:03PM +0100, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 07, 2017 at 12:21:24PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> >> FWIW, last time I asked about this, it was a toolchain bug on armel
> >> (std::atomic doesn't work). Is there any other information I should know
> >> about?
> > It is not true that std::atomic doesn't work on armel,
> > and that's not what the error message is about.
>
> If you can't use something from std:: without linking to an extra library,
> it “doesn't work” in my world. :-) Especially given that it used to work just
> fine.
armel needing -latomic here is new with gcc 7,
but it already used to not work on mips/mipsel
and several non-release architectures before.
> > The following patch fixes the FTBFS on armel
> > and the other architectures where nageru currently FTBFS:
>
> I'll be happy to include the patch in the next upload, but I do consider it a
> workaround (and in particular, I won't be pulling it upstream).
My patch is for debian/rules and points to the gcc bug.
cu
Adrian
--
"Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
"Only a promise," Lao Er said.
Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed
