Source: belr Version: 0.1.3-1 Severity: important Justification: fails to build from source
Builds of belr for 32-bit architectures such as i386 failed because libbelr.so.1's symbols differed from expectations in a number of places, even after demangling. (Architecture-dependent types like size_t are likely involved.) The build for s390x (a somewhat idiosyncratic 64-bit architecture) also encountered errors from dpkg-gensymbols, though in this case the only discrepancies were a few missing symbols. You can find details at https://buildd.debian.org/status/logs.php?pkg=belr&ver=0.1.3-1 Could you please take a look and account for these differences? NB: I have not checked whether there are any differences across 32-bit architectures. Thanks! -- Aaron M. Ucko, KB1CJC (amu at alum.mit.edu, ucko at debian.org) http://www.mit.edu/~amu/ | http://stuff.mit.edu/cgi/finger/[email protected]
