On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 11:21:49AM -0400, Antoine Beaupré wrote: > I think what we would need here is a "before/after" set of tricky > changelog files and flags. Building such a corpus takes time, > unfortunately, but the actual tests shouldn't be that hard...
Yeah, I agree on that..
Anyway, I've wrote a very very small testcase that clearly is not
exercising anything at all, just for some peace of mind.
I also tweaked the merge that you did with your first patches; as I
wrote in a commit I doubt that code ever worked at all, as those regex
looks wrong to me on several levels, but it's so messy that I don't feel
like further refactoring it by myself.
All in all, I've committed it, I'd appreciate if people could run with
git's debchange so to also check nothing was broken by this.
--
regards,
Mattia Rizzolo
GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540 .''`.
more about me: https://mapreri.org : :' :
Launchpad user: https://launchpad.net/~mapreri `. `'`
Debian QA page: https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=mattia `-
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
