On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 03:41:13PM -0500, Don Dutile wrote: > On 11/14/2017 02:08 PM, Jason Gunthorpe wrote: > >>However, it would of course be better to teach udma_barrier.h about > >>these architectures. > > > >The issue is that some architectures just can't do cache coherent DMA > >on any implementation. eg m68k > > > >There is no correct udma_barrier.h at all in those cases. > > > >We need to teach debian to follow cmake and exclude the missing > >installables in these cases.. > > > >Or do not build at all on these arch's.. > > > >Jason > Jason: > Why am I being cc'd on this debian bug?
You were not cc'd... The linux-rdma mailing list has been subscribed to the debian bug feed for rdma-core :\ Unclear if this is a good idea or not, but for now I think being supportive of Benjamin is a good call as he has done so much work to get the packages accepted. You can probably filter and discard messages with these two headers together: List-ID: <linux-rdma.vger.kernel.org> X-Debian-PR-Package: src:rdma-core Jason
