On 9 Dec 2017 10:16, Andreas Tille <[email protected]> wrote: I guess you want to express that from a Debian packaging point of view we simply wait until #1471 is fixed, right?
I guess. I'm not sure if from a Debian packaging point of view it would be better to back port the patch or ship a new version. Or do you think we should add a strong depends of the -sql package? Seeing how upstream treats this as a bug they want to fix, I don't think that's the way to go. Cheers, Kai
