Hi, On Mon, Dec 11, 2017 at 11:21:25AM +0100, Mattia Rizzolo wrote: > On Mon, Dec 11, 2017 at 11:16:23AM +0100, Guido Günther wrote: > > The issue here sees to be that dput-ng prefers dput.cf over it's own > > configuration and that was outdated due to dput being remove but not > > perged due to the conflict. > > Right, that works as intended, I'd consider it a configuration issue on > the user side. > Would you agree?
Almost. The issue here is that dput.cf overrides configuration of dput once an for all without updating it. Feel free to close this one but since I'm at least the second person stepping onto this it seems to be a common error. I would totally agree if dput.cf only contained users additions or overrides but it also provides defaults. Cheers, -- Guido