On 15-Dec-2017, Alf Gaida wrote: > On 15.12.2017 21:04, Ben Finney wrote: > > So I think you've demonstrated this is not anything to do with the > > Distribution field. > > You are right, but that's not the point - and i have no real problems > with the current behaviour - it only sucked the first time i noticed > that.
I'm having difficulty figuring out what bug is being described here. > It migth be that one get distracted within the work (cell, phone, > wife, dog, whatever) - and simply forget to release/sign the files. > And in that case it would be nice to have a little bit more user > friendly message, so the reaction would not be "WTF?!" but "Ok, > pebcak" The message describes accurately what the problem is: the file is being checked for a GnuPG signature, and has no GnuPG data. You've acknowledged that is correct behaviour. So I'm left without knowing what specific problem this bug report is for. Can you describe what the specific problem is, and say what concrete change you're proposing that would address the specific problem? -- \ “Cooles & Heates: If you want just condition of warm in your | `\ room, please control yourself.” —air conditioner instructions, | _o__) Japan | Ben Finney <bign...@debian.org>
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
