On 12/18/2017 07:26 PM, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > On 18/12/17 19:19, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote: >> On 12/17/2017 11:08 PM, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote: >>> On 12/17/2017 02:27 PM, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote: >>>> On 12/17/2017 10:38 AM, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: >>>>> On 15/12/17 23:11, Bas Couwenberg wrote: >>>>>> Package: release.debian.org >>>>>> Severity: normal >>>>>> User: release.debian....@packages.debian.org >>>>>> Usertags: transition >>>>>> >>>>>> For the Debian GIS team I'd like to transition to GDAL 2.2.3. >>>>>> >>>>>> Like the previous transition to GDAL 2.2.2 (#876561), there is no SONAME >>>>>> bump, only the virtual ABI package changed to account for the C++ symbol >>>>>> changes. >>>>>> >>>>>> All reverse dependencies rebuilt successfully with GDAL 2.2.3 from >>>>>> experimental as summarized below. >>>>>> >>>>>> libgdal-grass doesn't need a binNMU as the 2.2.3 version will be >>>>>> uploaded to unstable instead. liblas likewise doesn't need a binNMU, >>>>>> the version is experimental will be moved to unstable instead. >>>>> >>>>> Go ahead. >>>> >>>> Thanks, gdal (2.2.3+dfsg-1), liblas (1.8.1-6) & libgdal-grass (2.2.3-1) >>>> have been uploaded to unstable. >>> >>> gdal (2.2.3+dfsg-1) has been built & installed on all release >>> architectures, we should be ready for the binNMUs now. >> >> Thanks for scheduling the binNMUs. >> >> Please also binNMU mapnik in experimental. > > mapnik and opencv binNMU'ed on experimental.
The testing migration seems to be blocked by opencv. It FTBFS on various release architectures due to tesseract (#884903) which also triggered an uncoordinated transition. Should we wait for autoremoval to kick in? Kind Regards, Bas -- GPG Key ID: 4096R/6750F10AE88D4AF1 Fingerprint: 8182 DE41 7056 408D 6146 50D1 6750 F10A E88D 4AF1
