On Mon, Dec 18, 2017 at 10:03 AM, Osamu Aoki <[email protected]> wrote: > You mean these are different? Which one? I am a bit confused.
Yes, they are different. The ibus-1.15.14 tarball has ./autogen.sh run for you. The other one is automatically generated by GitHub and only includes the files that were checked in to git. I suppose it's fine to use the tarball you are using. If upstream would switch to a build system like meson, they wouldn't need to worry about ./autogen.sh or ./configure and the tarball should be equal to what's in git. > Unless those are bad, I thought having old tars are OK. pristine-tar is good. I can build your 1.15.17-1 release fine (I had problems with your git repo earlier) so you can ignore my suggested history rewrite. > But let me sleep now. I think I need to cut down on packaging. Are you > willing to take over this package? I am completely behind these days. I don't use any input methods or ibus. My next input method related task is to try to get that gtk2 thing we did applied to the other gtk2 input method modules. I could maybe join pkg-ime but I don't really intend to take over maintenance for any of these packages. By the way, could you remove the extra debian/patches/ that don't apply any more to keep things from being cluttered? Thanks, Jeremy Bicha
