Hi Josselin, On Wed, Feb 22, 2006 at 11:58:40PM +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote: > Yes, this is because we thought these binaries are not necessary for the > installer. Removing them makes the udeb smaller. Are there real reasons > for having them in the udeb?
Not seeing this mentioned in the Changelog I thought it was not done on purpose. As you can tell I'm not a font expert and I thought running fc-cache was needed/useful; could you please tell me why you think the graphical installer does not need such commands? thanx Davide
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
