On Sunday, December 24, 2017 12:04:26 PM CST you wrote:
> Hi Steve,
> 
> Yes, liblo still (forcibly) fails on sparc. The failure is enforced in
> debian/rules 

Ah, thanks.  Now I see it :-)


> so I don't need a patch for it. So unfortunately you still
> need to avoid liblo in sparc/sparc64. Sorry.

Will do.
 
> Saludos
> 
> On Sun, Dec 24, 2017 at 12:51 AM, Steve Robbins <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Hello Felipe,
> > 
> > I'm unsure of the current state of liblo w.r.t. the SPARC architecture. 
> > At
> > one point -- see below -- it was forcibly failing.  But latest changelog
> > (0.29-1) reads "drop all debian packages".  So I presume the forced
> > failure is
> > gone?   Does liblo work now or do I still need to do something with
> > nyquist --
> > a user of liblo.
> > 
> > Thanks,
> > -Stev
> > 
> > On Thursday, December 19, 2013 10:13:21 PM CST you wrote:
> > > Dear maintainers of liblo-reverse dependencies, I forward you the mail
> > > in which I request the removal of liblo in sparc. If your package can
> > > opt out of using liblo and you want to support sparc, please drop the
> > > dependency there, as liblo will no longer be available in that
> > > architecture. Otherwise, your package will have to be removed from
> > > sparc.
> > > 
> > > Thanks
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 732386: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=732386
> > > 
> > > 
> > > ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> > > From: Felipe Sateler <[email protected]>
> > > Date: Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 10:49 AM
> > > Subject: Bug#732386: RM: liblo [sparc] -- ANAIS; Does not work, never
> > > has
> > > To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[email protected]>
> > > 
> > > 
> > > Package: ftp.debian.org
> > > Severity: normal
> > > 
> > > liblo (all binaries) needs to be removed from sparc. I doesn't work, and
> > > never has. Please see bug #721617 for details (TLDR; unaligned access
> > > and SIGBUS). Upstream may or may not fix the issue eventually.
> > > 
> > > I have just uploaded a version (0.26~repack-8) that purposely fails on
> > > sparc and sparc64, so that it doesn't build again.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Reply via email to