[...] Le jeudi 23 février 2006 à 19:15 +1000, Kel Modderman a écrit : > 90% of the time i also use kernel-package, not m-a, but that is not the > point. I believe m-a lays the best framework for the average user to > easily install a module. I totally agree, but I think the best choice is to let the user choice what he wants, with a default choice for non power users.
> >Regarding the documentation, maybe it would be good to insist on the > >kernel-package method too. > I would certainly enjoy receiving contributed documentation :-) Good point ;-) [...] > Ok, i see two alternatives:- > > 1) > Package: madwifi-source > Architecture: all > Depends: debhelper (>= 4.1.0), build-essential, module-assistant | > kernel-package, sharutils, bzip2 > > or > > 2) > Package: madwifi-source > Architecture: all > Depends: debhelper (>= 4.1.0), build-essential, module-assistant, > sharutils, bzip2 > Recommends: kernel-package > > Which would you prefer? Would that be enough to satisfy your wish? The first is the the best imo, as it really lets the user free not to have m-a installed. Cheers, Julien