Ian Jackson writes ("Re: [pkg-gnupg-maint] Bug#868550: reprepro seems to
provide a repro"):
> I put a wrapper around my gpg wrapper, so that only one copy of gpg
> could be invoked across the whole set of parallel tests, in case the
> different processes were sharing something I wasn't aware of.
>
> That didn't seem to make much difference. I think this demonstrates
> that the failure can occur with entirely sequential gnupg invocations.
I also added a "sleep 1" at the top of my inner gnupg wrapper, it the
one which runs with the lock held. This means that there's a gap of
at least 1s between any two actual gnupg processes. That doesn't seem
to have made much difference either.
Ian.
--
Ian Jackson <[email protected]> These opinions are my own.
If I emailed you from an address @fyvzl.net or @evade.org.uk, that is
a private address which bypasses my fierce spamfilter.
