Hi, On Sat, 06 Jan 2018, Michael Stapelberg wrote: > > > If yes, then I don’t particularly like the name “nondfsg/latest”, as > > > it is a double-negative, but describes a very common case. Why not > > > keep calling it “upstream”, or “upstream/latest” if symmetry is > > > desired? > > > > Isn't that what we're using for the filtered sources. The longer I think > > about it I think that > > > > https://honk.sigxcpu.org/projects/git-buildpackage/ > > manual-html/gbp.branch.naming.html > > > > fits better than DEP14. Maybe we should modify DEP14 to say that > > upstream/ keeps the unfiltered source and dfsgclean/ the filtered one? > > Raphael, any thoughts?
I think that if you want to change this, then we should discuss it on debian-devel. If everything comes down to the fact that you don't find a good name, I'm happy to throw a few suggestions: What about "pristine-upstream" or "original-upstream" or "upstream.orig" or "uptream.real" for the non-filtered upstream branch ? Cheers, -- Raphaël Hertzog ◈ Debian Developer Support Debian LTS: https://www.freexian.com/services/debian-lts.html Learn to master Debian: https://debian-handbook.info/get/
