On Tue, 09 Jan 2018, Manfred Ilg wrote:
> Same result... even with option --png

Perfect. Looks like the only difference is the output scaling which is
selected in your ps and mine:

--- test_2.ps   2018-01-09 09:05:50.215525284 -0800
+++ test.ps     2018-01-08 09:25:15.316197249 -0800
@@ -5116,7 +5116,7 @@
 /helpEmmentaler-20 where {pop helpEmmentaler-20} if
 /helpEmmentaler-23 where {pop helpEmmentaler-23} if
 /helpEmmentaler-26 where {pop helpEmmentaler-26} if
-56.3706 -6.1670 moveto /TeXGyreSchola-Bold 76.72070312 output-scale div 
selectfont
+56.3706 -6.1670 moveto /TeXGyreSchola-Bold 6.13769531 output-scale div 
selectfont
 1.5023 0.0000 0.0000 /t
 1.7072 0.0000 0.0000 /s
 2.0145 0.0000 0.0000 /e
@@ -5128,5 +5128,5 @@
 22.9264 -11.4993 moveto magfontemmentaler-20mXVo /noteheads.s2 glyphshow
-7.0806 -11.3017 moveto /TeXGyreSchola-Regular 48.32714844 output-scale div 
selectfont
+7.0806 -11.3017 moveto /TeXGyreSchola-Regular 3.86523438 output-scale div 
selectfont
 1.0926 0.0000 0.0000 /e
 0.8536 0.0000 0.0000 /t
 1.0584 0.0000 0.0000 /odieresis
@@ -5141,7 +5141,7 @@
 1.4682 0.0000 0.0000 /F
 5 print_glyphs
 31.1216 -165.1512 moveto 0.00000000 -0.44386299 currentpoint vector_add  
57.25832598 1.63887874 currentpoint vector_add (http://lilypond.org/) mark_URI
-31.1216 -165.1512 moveto /TeXGyreSchola-Regular 48.32714844 output-scale div 
selectfont
+31.1216 -165.1512 moveto /TeXGyreSchola-Regular 3.86523438 output-scale div 
selectfont
 1.1950 0.0000 0.0000 /g
 0.9902 0.0000 0.0000 /r
 1.0926 0.0000 0.0000 /o


Unfortunately, I'm not an expert on how that output scaling gets
selected; maybe the upstream mailing list might have an idea? [I think
it could be something with the magnification which is selected; could
you try running the example in a new home directory or under a different
user?]

-- 
Don Armstrong                      https://www.donarmstrong.com

I finally developed
a computer with feelings.
It just doesn't have
feelings for me.
 -- a softer world #633
    http://www.asofterworld.com/index.php?id=633

Reply via email to