On Mon 05 Sep 2005 at 14:30:11 +0200, you wrote: Content-Description: message body text > there is no tag 'pedantic' ... >
Content-Description: forwarded message > X-Loop: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Reply-To: Justin Pryzby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > X-Debian-PR-Message: report 325056 > X-Debian-PR-Package: bash > X-Debian-PR-Keywords: > User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i > X-Virus-Scanned: Symantec AntiVirus Scan Engine > Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at cs.tu-berlin.de (including spamassassin) > X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0 tagged_above=0 required=3 tests= > X-Spam-Level: > Resent-From: Justin Pryzby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Resent-To: debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org > Resent-CC: Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Resent-Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2005 20:18:04 UTC > Resent-Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Resent-Sender: Debian BTS <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > From: Justin Pryzby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Debian BTS Submission <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Bug#325056: bash: [COMPLETION] misinformation in /etc/bash_completion > Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2005 16:07:46 -0400 > > Package: bash > Version: 3.0-15 > Severity: minor > File: /etc/bash_completion > > The first line of says: > > # bash_completion - some programmable completion functions for bash 2.05b > > but, this is bash 3.0. Best case, this is just leftovers and > something that hasn't yet been updated. Worst case, bash2 completion > is actually inconsistent with bash3 completion. That doesn't seem to > be the case, since I also see: > > # features supported by bash 3.0 and higher Fixed for next release. Ian -- Ian Macdonald | "There are things that are so serious that [EMAIL PROTECTED] | you can only joke about them" - Heisenberg http://www.caliban.org/ | | | -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
